Jump to content

Vectors vs. Rasters


Lyipheoryia

Recommended Posts

I personally prefer Vectors, but they're a bit hard if trying to make an image realistic.

 

For those that don't know:

Vectors-no pixels required, cartoon-style art, smooth lines

Raster-pixels, realistic imagery and art, your computer screen is uses raster graphics  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/8/2016 at 8:11 PM, Lyipheoryia said:

I personally prefer Vectors, but they're a bit hard if trying to make an image realistic.

 

For those that don't know:

Vectors-no pixels required, cartoon-style art, smooth lines

Raster-pixels, realistic imagery and art, your computer screen is uses raster graphics  

 

Vectors are much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Na11 said:

Vectors are much better.

Not always.

 

For starters, photographs are raster.  For realistic images, rasters are required.  The digital screen you're looking at right now is also raster graphics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Lux said:

My art program I use, Fire Alpaca, I think defaults to Vector images, but i can flip between the two. 

I don't think so~  

I use FireAlpaca, and it's raster~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Lyipheoryia said:

I don't think so~  

I use FireAlpaca, and it's raster~

Err... got it flipped in my mind!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Lux said:

Err... got it flipped in my mind!

Perhaps.  I know that FireAlpalca, Photoshop, Corel, Paint, GIMP, Serif DrawPlus, Smoothdraw, Krita, and most other ones are raster (at least...I think so).

The vector ones I know of are: Inkscape, Artweaver, and that's about it~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...